An Open Letter to the UMC from the United Methodist Queer Clergy Caucus

Click here to sign and express your support

Click here to read the press release about the letter.

 

April 16, 2017, Easter Sunday

Dear United Methodist Church,

In a week, our Judicial Council will be called into session to decide on the worthiness of the ministries and lives of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer, Questioning and Intersex (LGBTQI) clergy persons who have been examined, voted upon, and overwhelmingly affirmed by faithful United Methodist clergy and laity. These cases stem from questions of legality and briefs filed after the licensing, commissioning, and ordination of queer clergy in New York Annual Conference, Northern Illinois Annual Conference, and the consecration of Bishop Karen Oliveto. We, your LGBTQI clergy, write to you before their session begins to respond in love to this harm.

We, as the community of queer clergy that represent over 170 persons in 26 annual conferences, stand together: we are all one body and one church. Together we affirm and are proud of our denomination’s core beliefs and mission. We are deeply committed to introducing new people to the Way of Jesus, challenging all people (ourselves included) to grow in holiness and justice, and taking missional risks for the Gospel. While these questions, briefs and complaints are filed against some LGBTQI individuals, we consider them to be against all of us. These actions can also be considered as a general attack on the evangelism, discipleship, and mission potential of the United Methodist movement. They are hurtful to us, and they are hurtful to the whole Church. We write on behalf of our full queer clergy connection, acknowledging all those who identify as LGBTQI within and beyond our denomination who feel rejected and alienated from the church, a place purported to be the epicenter of Christ’s radical, unconditional, and unbounded love.

As a guiding principle of our Wesleyan tradition, we value and hold ourselves to do no harm. These briefs, along with complaints and charges filed against LGBTQI persons based solely on one’s sexual orientation and gender identity, are harmful. They not only fracture the body of Christ and dehumanize LGBTQI persons, but do harm to Creation, preventing a path to God’s “more excellent way” of love (1 Corinthians 12:31). These words and actions should be considered divisive by our ecclesiastical leaders and bodies. Hateful and narrow language, such as “self-avowed practicing homosexuals” does not define our sacred selves. These cases use our beloved families as weapons against us and reduce our loving relationships to sexual acts. They also drive seekers of Christ away and distract from our mission of making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world. We lead truthful, full and loving lives, some of us in relationships with cherished partners and spouses. We are mothers, fathers, siblings, children, and grandchildren. We are all ministers, who have been called by God, certified as candidates, licensed, commissioned and/or ordained, and consecrated.

We respond to God’s Great Commission to proclaim the good news to all people, and we intend to live into the reality of the beautiful, bold, diverse, and inclusive Body of Christ. We uphold our denomination’s call to inclusiveness. “Inclusiveness means openness, acceptance, and support that enables all persons to participate in the life of the church, the community, and the world; therefore, inclusiveness denies every semblance of discrimination” (¶ 140 Book of Discipline). In following that vision and God’s call in our own lives, we answer to a higher authority than earthly institutional power and will not accept unjust laws when they run contrary to the Gospel.

We stand firm in our baptismal vows “to confess Jesus as [our] Saviour [and] put [our] whole trust in his grace” and “..to resist evil, injustice, and oppression in whatever forms they present themselves.” With humility and courage, we commit ourselves to Christ’s command that we love God and love one another.

We stand in support of every clergy person threatened by unjust actions, and our sibling, Bishop Karen Oliveto, as her standing is being challenged before the Judicial Council. Bishop Oliveto’s election is a visible demonstration of what is possible within The United Methodist Church when the gifts, graces, and call to ministry of LGBTQI persons are recognized and fully valued. We pray that the Judicial Council upholds clergy/episcopal fair process protections and our right to trial.

Whatever determinations are made by the upcoming Judicial Council, we will continue to run with perseverance the race set before us, looking to Christ, the pioneer and perfecter of our faith (Hebrews 12:1-2). We continue to hold our entire United Methodist Connection in prayer, seeking God’s grace and wisdom in the coming days.

Your siblings in Christ,

United Methodist Queer Clergy Caucus Representing over 170 persons in 26 Annual Conferences (including our Hidden Faithful siblings)

UMQCC Open Letter Signatories:

Rev. Jeanelle Nicolas Ablola
Rev. Brian Adkins
Rev. Austin Adkinson
Rev. Dr. Israel I. Alvaran
Rev. Elyse Ambrose
Rev. Douglas A. Asbury
M Barclay
Pastor Denyse Barnes
Rev. Bonnie Beckonchrist
Rev. Ann E. Berney
Rev. Rachel Birkhahn-Rommelfanger
Rev. Anna Blaedel
Rev. Daryl Blanksma
Rev. Jan Bolerjack
Rev. Thomas R. Boller
Rev. Elizabeth Brick
Rev. Tony Brown
Rev. Kristan Burkert
Rev. John Cahall
Rev. Dr. Joanne Carlson Brown
Rev. Dana Carroll
Rev. Jim Carter
Rev. Ronna Case
Rev. Karen Cook
Angie Cox
Rev. Britt Cox
Rev. Karen Dammann
Rev. Randa D’Aoust
Rev. Jani Darak-Druck
Rev. Alex da Silva Souto
Pastor Sean Delmore
Rev. Amy E. DeLong
Rev. Dr. James A. Dwyer
Rev. Greg Eaton
Rev. Dr. Janet Everhart
Rev. Renae Extrum-Fernandez
Rev. Anthony Fatta
Pastor Alexis Francisco
Rev. Rock Fremont
Micah Gary-Fryer
Rev. Ruth Ann Charlotte Geiger
Rev. Nestor S. Gerente
Rev. Sandy Gess
Rev. John Girard
Rev. Becca Girrell
Pastor Kaiyra Greer
Rev. John Edwin Griffin
Rev. Gregory D. Gross
Pastor Taylor Gould
Rev. Nancy Goyings
Rev. Will Ed Green
Rev. Dr. Emily B. Hall
Rev. Trey Hall
Rev. Dr. Edward J. Hansen
Rev. Janet Hanson
Rev. Marcia Hauer
Pastor Ashley Hawkins
Rev. Michael A. House
Rev. Betty J. Howard
Rev. Ann Hunt
Rev. Brittany Isaac
Peter Jabin
Rev. Dr. David Jenkins
Rev. Marguerite K. Jhonson
Rev. C. Michele Johns
Jacey Johnson
Rev. Elizabeth Jones
Rev. Lindsey Kerr
Rev. Dr. Jeanne Gayle Knepper
Rev. Katie Ladd
Rev. Bruce Lamb
Rev. Sue Laurie
Rev. Ardis Letey
Rev. Dan Lewis
Rev. Fred Lewis
Rev. Samantha Lewis
Rev. Dr. Pamela R. Lightsey
Pastor Christine Lindeberg
Pastor Rolly Loomis
Rev. Kelly Love
Adam Marshall
Rev. Dr. Joretta L. Marshall
Rev. Lea A. Matthews
Rev. Lois McCullen Parr
Rev. Courtney McHill
Rev. Ralph A. Merante
Rev. David. W. Meredith
Rev. Cynthia S. Meyer
Pastor Kathleen Meyerson
Rev. Jerry M. Miller
Katelyn Miller
Rev. Sharon L. Moe
Rev. Dr. Richard W. Moman
Rev. Deborah Morgan
Rev. Jeffrey S. Mullinix
Rev. Rachel Neer
Rev. Joshua M. Noblitt
Rev. Catherine Noellert
Rev. Gregory Norton
Rev. Dr. Rebecca Parker
Rev. Matthew Alexander Pearson
Rev. Drew Phoenix
Emily Pickens-Jones
Rev. Jay K. Pierce
Rev. Jeanne Audrey Powers
Kendall Protzmann
Pastor Kathleen Reynolds
Pastor Jonathan Rodríguez-Cintrón
Rev. Maggie Roe
Rev. Daniel Sailer
Rev. Siobhan Sargent
Kenneth Schoon
Rev. Tyler Schwaller
Pastor Kimberly Scott
Pastor Ryan J. Scott
Rev. Patricia Simpson
Rev. Kim Smith
Rev. Dr. Althea Spencer Miller
Rev. Nea Stepp
Rev. Terri Stewart
Rev. Katie Stickney
Rev. Kristin Stoneking
Pastor Charles Straight
Rev. Mark Sturgess
Grant Swanson
Rev. Sara Thompson Tweedy
Rev. Ronald D. Tompkins
Rev. Adrienne Trevathan
Rev. Dr. Frank E. Trotter, Jr.
Dr. Joan Van Dessel
Rev. Martha E. Vink
Anna Voinovich
Rev. Vivian Ruth Waltz
Rev. Kathleen Weber
Rev. Dr. David Weekley
Rev. Judy WestLee
Jennifer Weyenberg
Rev. Jay Williams
Rev. Dr. Mark Williams
Rev. Brenda S. Wills
Rev. Jarell Wilson
Rev. John R. Wooden
Rev. Vicki Woods
Rev. Wendy Joy Woodworth
Rev. Frank D. Wulf
Rev. Laura Young
Rev. Nancy Kay Yount

Click here to sign and express your support
Click here to read the press release about the letter.
The original letter is published here.

www.umqcc.org

MIND Spring 2017 Organizing Meeting

MIND will be hosting a general meeting at five different locations. We encourage everyone to attend the meeting date and location that works best for you.

The MIND steering committee is grateful to the following hosts of the Spring 2017 meeting from 3:00-5:00 p.m.:

April 30th
New Paltz UMC (1 Grove St, New Paltz, NY 12561)
Park Avenue UMC (106 E 86th St, New York, NY 10028)
Katonah UMC (5 Bedford Rd, Katonah, NY 10536)

May 7th
St. Paul’s UMC (270 Main St, Northport, NY 11768)
Cheshire UMC (205 Academy Rd, Cheshire, CT 06410)

More information will be coming through this newsletter and via social media. We hope you are able to attend one of these meetings, and offer a special invitation to those of you who have never attended a MIND meeting. YOU are a part of this movement, so please come meet some friends and learn how YOU can help make the United Methodist Church a more welcoming, inclusive place that celebrates all God’s children, without exception!

Bishop’s Ruling of Law II – MIND Responds

We commend Bishop Jane Allen Middleton for offering clarification of the proper sphere of the work of the Board of Ordained Ministry and hope that the Judicial Council will find her reasoning persuasive when it passes judgment on her ruling in the spring. Her ruling is published on the NYAC web site.

A summary of the issues is provided here. We will follow and report on these developments as things evolve, but there should be no illusion about the limitations of dealing with the Judicial Council or the General Conference when it comes to justice for LGBTQI persons. The only reason that the 2016 General Conference did not pass sweeping draconian punitive measures that would have tied the hands of Bishops, Boards of Ministry, and anyone else involved in seeking LGBTQI equality in the church was that the General Conference was brought to crisis by protest. The Judicial Council has made clear that it has no intention to seek justice for LGBTQI persons, seeing its role only in terms of the narrow interpretation of the Discipline of the United Methodist Church.

Summary of the Case:
Since the June 2016 New York Annual Conference session there has been a legal back-and-forth involving a challenge by an opponent of LGBTQI equality to the rulings made at the 2016 Clergy Session by then Interim Bishop Jane Allen Middleton. The challenge relates to declarations of the New York Annual Conference Board of Ordained Ministry prior to the 2016 annual conference affirming equal consideration of all qualified candidates and the significance of that affirmation for the voting on clergy candidates at the 2016 Clergy Session.

At the Clergy Session of the 2016 Annual Conference, by near unanimous vote, thirteen candidates for provisional membership and fourteen candidates for full membership as an ordained elder were approved as recommended by the Board of Ordained Ministry. In the midst of this joyful affirmation an associate member without vote requested a Decision of Law on four questions related to whether certain proceedings and procedures of the Board of Ordained Ministry were in accordance with the Book of Discipline’s stipulations.

Interim Bishop Jane Allen Middleton ruled at the annual conference session that the affirmation and ordination of these candidates was indeed in order. In July 2016, as required by church law, Interim Bishop Jane Allen Middleton issued a formal written statement in support of her rulings at the annual conference session. As per church law, her statement was reviewed by the Judicial Council. In October 2016 the Judicial Council affirmed her rulings in part, but reversed her ruling on two points, requiring her to respond to the following two questions posed by the opponent of LGBTQI equality at the clergy session.

Question 1: “Is the Conference Board of Ordained Ministry required to ascertain whether a candidate meets the qualifications for candidacy and ordained ministry, including whether or not she or he is exhibiting ‘fidelity in marriage and celibacy in singleness’ or is a self-avowed practicing homosexual?”

Question 2: “Can the Conference Board of Ordained Ministry legally recommend to the clergy session a candidate whom they believe to be a self-avowed practicing homosexual or otherwise in violation of the fidelity and celibacy standard?”

In her December 20, 2016 Decision of Law II Bishop Middleton answered “No” to both questions. The explanations for her replies are now published.

We believe that the Bishop is correct that “ascertain” is a level of inquiry that goes beyond what Boards of Ordained Ministry are required to do. The term suggests that instead of being an entity that measures the effectiveness of candidates for ministry, the Board of Ordained Ministry is to be an inquisitorial body that investigates bedroom practices in great detail. That is not what Boards of Ordained Ministry should be about.

As to the second question, to jump to a conclusion about someone’s sexual practice simply based on “belief” would be improper as well. To endanger someone’s future in ministry with a subjective opinion about something that can be objectively determined would be highly inappropriate.

We commend Bishop Middleton for the wisdom and clarity of her responses to these questions.

Our Task:
Regardless of the response of the Judicial Council to Bishop Jane Allen Middleton’s ruling, justice and progress will prevail only through the continued Biblical Obedience by clergy, laity, Boards of Ministry, annual conferences, and local congregations in support of the full and equal embrace of LGBTQI persons in every sphere of the church’s life. It is good to stay informed in these matters, but it is of greater importance to make your witness and to insist upon and to act upon the principle of equality in your role as a layperson, as a local church leader, as a clergy person, as a member of The Board of Ordained Ministry or of a District Committee on Ministry, as a District Superintendent, or as a Bishop.

MIND Statement on Judicial Council Ruling

The fall meeting of the United Methodist Judicial Council has ruled — late on Saturday night! — regarding a bishop’s decision of law over whether the conference board of ordained ministry “is required to ascertain whether a candidate meets the qualifications for candidacy and ordained ministry, including whether or not she or he is exhibiting ‘fidelity in marriage and celibacy in singleness’ or is a ‘self-avowed practicing homosexual.’

A link to the full ruling, and a statement from MIND, follow.

MIND Statement on Judicial Council Ruling

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

October 30, 2016

CONTACT:  Bruce Lamb, 917-580-0830

October 30, 2016 – The Judicial Council with this ruling has attempted to tighten the vice grip of discriminatory mandates in the UMC. In remanding the question of whether BOOM can legally recommend our LGBTQI candidates for ordination and commissioning while citing JCD 886 and asserting that the Board “may not… violate provisions of the Discipline,” the Judicial Council has washed its hands of the dirty work of enforcing discrimination and demanded that our bishop do it instead.

It is ever more clear that the only way forward for LGBTQI and their allies in the UMC is live in non-conformity with unjust rules. This ruling reaffirms our experience that all institutional channels of change are closed to queer people. ordination4

The New York Annual Conference has a decades-long history of dissent from the denomination’s prejudice against LGBTQI people. Our Board of Ordained Ministry has embraced a path of non-discrimination, and we call on them now to reaffirm their decision.
We call on Bishop Bickerton to embrace and affirm their decision as well.

Read the Judicial Council Ruling here