Part of a movement

[This article was updated in July 2011]

MIND’s marriage initiative  is a bold and creative idea to make marriage equality a lived reality for gay and lesbian United Methodists in the New York Annual Conference – but it is not a new idea nor is it uniquely radical. In fact, all over the UMC a movement has been gathering steam to change the church by changing what church people do. Specifically, by deciding that they will stop discriminating against LGBT people by “supporting and honoring same-gender marriages in the same way that we support and honor other marriages,” as Foundry UMC  put it.

Foundry, a reconciling congregation in Washington, DC, decided in September 2010 to approve the use of its sanctuary and the participation of its clergy in gay weddings. A congregation-wide vote approved the policy 367-8 after four months of discernment and discussion. The decision to celebrate gay weddings came after the District of Columbia legalized gay marriage. It was the second Washington UMC congregation to take this step. Earlier this year, Dumbarton UMC also pledged to honor and celebrate same-sex weddings.  “As a pastor, I am called to extend care and grace to all people even as Jesus did," says the Rev. Mary Kay Totty, Dumbarton's appointed pastor. She and 11 other ordained clergy affiliated with Dumbarton are now available to marry gay and lesbian couples.

[In June 2011, a group of clergy members in the Minnesota Annual Conference released a statement announcing their decision to marry all couples "desiring Christian marriage." When the announcement was made, during their annual conference meeting, there were 40 signers. By the end of the conference, there were 70. Read their statement here.]

[Following the Minnestoa action, similar pledges were signed by hundreds and hundreds of clergy it at least six other annual conferences. This movement keeps growing! We are going to stop updaing this news story here. Instead, please visit this page in the marriage initiative section of the site for the latest information; we will be updating that page regularly.]

The Minnesota clergy, Dumbarton and Foundry are the latest groups to publicly declare a decision to marry gays and lesbians, but other efforts date back to at least 1998. A network of retired clergy in the New England Annual Conference responded to their pastoral call to “seek peace, justice, and freedom for all people” by performing gay unions and marriages. They founded the Reconciling Retired Clergy of the New England Conference and declared their intention to officiate at gay unions in 1998; the founder of the group, Rev. Dr. Richard E. Harding, wrote to the New England bishop to inform her of the decision. By early 1999, they had 17 clergy who had signed a covenant signifying their willingness to perform same-sex ceremonies. The list has continued to grow, and topped 100 by the time of the group’s 10^th anniversary.

Meanwhile, just as the New England clergy were organizing, a group of 68 clergy officiated at a lesbian holy union ceremony in Sacramento, CA in January 1999. Charges were brought against the 68, but eventually dropped. The New England group signed on as “co-officiants in absentia” and the New York Annual Conference passed a resolution in support  of the California 68 at its 2000 annual conference session.

California has often been in the vanguard of social movements, and when San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom made marriage legal in the city in 2004, UMC pastor Rev. Karen Oliveto (who hails from the NYAC, BTW) joyfully responded to requests from parishioners of hers to marry them. She presided over at least a dozen weddings in the brief time that marriage was legal in San Francisco.

Oliveto is one of many individual clergy who have for years simply treated gay and straight couples equally and officiated at same-sex services in defiance of the Book of Discipline. Some, like Oliveto, Rev. Gregory Dell  and Rev. Jimmy Creech, have had a high profile and made public statements about their ministry to gay couples. Many others simply provide pastoral care to their flocks quietly. Dell and Creech were both brought to church trials for performing same-sex weddings. Dell was suspended for a year in March 1999, and Creech was defrocked in November of that same year.

It seemed like the church was determined to squash efforts by its clergy to honor their conscience rather than discriminate against their congregants. Creech said the “larger impact [of his trial] is that it says to clergy that they must support what is unjust and immoral in order to remain clergy. That is a scandal.”

But official UMC opposition and sanctions have not stopped the movement towards marriage equality, either in the church or in the society at large. Dell was told that his suspension would be lifted at any time that he agreed to stop marrying gay people. He refused, publicly, instead issuing a statement that said “I will not withhold a ministry from some which is available to others solely because of an unjust church law.”

In civil society, marriage equality was catapulted to the top of the gay rights agenda in 1993 with an unexpected ruling from the Hawaii Supreme Court that held that marriage is a basic civil right and denying it to gay couples violated the state’s constitution. Since then, it has come to embody the very essence of the quest for equal rights for LGBT people. Love is a human right, and all that gay and lesbian people are seeking is equal rights under the law to recognize this most fundamental right. Marriage has now been legalized for gay people in six states, in some cases by judicial action and in some by legislative action. Significantly, a federal judge this year also found the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates the equal protection clause  of the 14^th Amendment, the cornerstone of civil rights jurisprudence in the United States. While there has been widespread backlash, including the passage of laws and constitutional amendments explicitly barring gay people from marriage in a majority of states, the constitutional case for gay marriage is strong and will almost certainly eventually prevail.

The question for those of us in the church is will we be a part of this march towards freedom, or will we remain obstacles in the path towards freedom? At Foundry and Dumbarton and in the clergy networks in New England and Minnesota, the answer is clear. And in MIND, our answer is clear as well. The Covenant of Conscience is a call to join the march towards freedom. With it, we proudly join the tradition of those in the church who have willingly and deliberately engaged in civil disobedience and ecclesial disobedience in an effort to end discrimination.

“One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws,” Martin Luther King wrote from his jail cell in Birmingham in 1963. Those words, part of the famous Letter from Birmingham Jail, were addressed to eight clergymen who had criticized King’s use of civil disobedience. Two of them were Methodist bishops. The struggle to get the church to act in defense of the oppressed and the persecuted is not new, but it’s a struggle we must engage.